I wanted to let everyone know that I am close to releasing an alternative version of my "MT Enhanced" plugin which will allow connecting to the Microsoft Translator service. The original connects to Google Translate, but offers some additional features compared with the native Studio plugin. As of today, I have got it working on plain text in my Studio installation, but want to tweak/test it a bit more before releasing, probably before the end of the month.
Hello Patrick,
That's interesting and is also one we have on the list that users have asked for. So will this be a single plugin that allows the user a choice or two seperate plugins?
Regards
Paul
Paul Filkin | RWS Group
________________________
Design your own training!
You've done the courses and still need to go a little further, or still not clear?
Tell us what you need in our Community Solutions Hub
Hello Patrick,
That's interesting and is also one we have on the list that users have asked for. So will this be a single plugin that allows the user a choice or two seperate plugins?
Regards
Paul
Paul Filkin | RWS Group
________________________
Design your own training!
You've done the courses and still need to go a little further, or still not clear?
Tell us what you need in our Community Solutions Hub
HI Paul,
That's a question I've been asking myself. Right now, I'm leaning toward making separate plugins. The disadvantage to putting them together would have to do with the complexity of the program itself (more user options/selections to keep track of, separate pieces of application logic to connect to the different services, etc.). Can you think of specific advantages of having them together in one plugin, other than simplicity of installation?
Hi Patrick,
I think the advantage is all the users, so they only have to install a single plugin to get both providers. But if they only wanted one they may prefer seperate plugins in the first place, so it's probably six of one and half a dozen of the other.
Supporting it would probably get more complex as you say, so keeping them seperate might be better.
Regards
Paul
Paul Filkin | RWS Group
________________________
Design your own training!
You've done the courses and still need to go a little further, or still not clear?
Tell us what you need in our Community Solutions Hub
Hi there,
Great to see this one! Just to chime in from a product management perspective - I think I would also prefer the separate solution. This will also mean you can "sell" it more prominently by not having to refer to a joint plug-in and potentially muddying the waters/confusing users. So it seems to be the cleaner solution all around to have a separate plug-in.
Thanks,
Daniel
Daniel Brockmann
Team Trados @ RWS
Thanks for the feedback, Daniel and Paul.
Translate
