<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.rws.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Language Cloud Developers</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12 Non-Production</generator><item><title>Forum Post: Task event payload is missing the outcome property</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60972/task-event-payload-is-missing-the-outcome-property</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:ed65bf6c-0720-4953-b1d9-f7fba865f453</guid><dc:creator>Laurent Pierret</dc:creator><description>Dear community, I try to capture task rejections via the PROJECT.TASK.UPDATED. According to the documentation , this event is triggered if a task is rejected. However, since the payload does not contain the outcome property (as described here ), it is not possible to identify from the payload that the event was triggered because the task was rejected (maybe because the task is not finished?). How can I identify the rejection? Thank you in advance for your support. Regards, Laurent</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Assign task to vendor via API</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60967/assign-task-to-vendor-via-api</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:4b3009f9-7165-45a0-8157-e4c5bdea1558</guid><dc:creator>Laurent Pierret</dc:creator><description>Hello, Via the API, I would like to change the assignee of task (human-translation) from a group to a vendor order template. When I try to do so, I do get a 422 response (U nprocessable Entity) with the following error: { &amp;quot;errorCode&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;invalid&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;message&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;Input validation error occurred. No further details available.&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;details&amp;quot;: [] } What is the reason? Do I need to perform an other step before assigning? Regards, Laurent</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: API call</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60828/api-call/192863</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:0e4e1468-96e2-440b-b363-458913b0eff2</guid><dc:creator>Nick Date</dc:creator><description>You can create a Service User in Users -&amp;gt; Service Users If you can&amp;#39;t see this, then you may not have the necessary entitlement. We cannot give this sort of information out on a public forum, so please raise a support case , and we will be happy to help.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: API call</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60828/api-call/192856</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:e5a70805-dff7-4506-b0a8-ba217f9fec0b</guid><dc:creator>Nzhdeh Barseghyan</dc:creator><description>Hi Laszlo David , here is my tenant ID - xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Thank you in advance.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: API call</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60828/api-call/192807</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:6a6779c4-c171-44f0-8d42-65b720a31843</guid><dc:creator>Laszlo David</dc:creator><description>hi Nzhdeh Barseghyan , can you provide some details? account/tenant id?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: API call</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60828/api-call</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:41a30dac-2c1b-4aab-b844-79b84681da32</guid><dc:creator>Nzhdeh Barseghyan</dc:creator><description>Hi! I am a developer building a standalone automation service using the Trados Public API. I need to set up a Service User for OAuth2 Client Credentials authentication, but I cannot locate the &amp;#39;Service Users&amp;#39; management area in my current dashboard. Can you please: Point me to the exact location of Service User management for my tenant? Confirm if my current subscription tier supports Public API access and the creation of Service Users? Verify if OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is enabled for my account&amp;#39;s file-type configurations so I can analyze JPG/PNG files? Thank you in advance.</description><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/API">API</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: Data bridge does not support "contains" in filter</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60765/data-bridge-does-not-support-contains-in-filter</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 07:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:aa1a5c4d-5a68-4c65-a758-b6732acc632d</guid><dc:creator>Laurent Pierret</dc:creator><description>Good morning, Although described here: developers.rws.com/.../OData-Query-Guide.html , the data bridge does not support the &amp;quot;contains&amp;quot; function in filter. See attached screenshot: the error says &amp;quot;Method are not allowed&amp;quot;. Thank you for your guidance.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Potential outage 24-25 FEB 2026</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60637/potential-outage-24-25-feb-2026/192150</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:76838777-a4c0-4a87-a4fd-fa2cf0977b95</guid><dc:creator>Laszlo David</dc:creator><description>Hi Evgenii: we can see from the logs: 2026-02-24 19:54:11.210 [Calling extension with id intento-routings-bcm-async-automatictask. Sending a POST request to connectors.inten.to/.../bcmtranslate_async but there was no callback received for this task in 4hours, so the task was expired</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Potential outage at Dec 27th, 10:01–22:30 PST</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/59999/potential-outage-at-dec-27th-10-01-22-30-pst/192147</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:21164826-f837-485f-84aa-40931605819a</guid><dc:creator>Laszlo David</dc:creator><description>The page where outages can be seen is: https://status.cloud.trados.com/</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Potential outage 24-25 FEB 2026</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60637/potential-outage-24-25-feb-2026</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:8ccae050-3634-4108-8a73-d0e335108bde</guid><dc:creator>Evgenii Samarin</dc:creator><description>Hello RWS team! Our client got an error in workflow tasks. Based on our logs/opentelemetry, there were no requests that we received. Could you please check what happened to the step in the workflow pipeline? Details about the error received: T ask,UNRESPONSIVE,699e01d571231a419a4df3bf</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to receive all fields of multiple termbase entries without exceeding URL length limit</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60438/how-to-receive-all-fields-of-multiple-termbase-entries-without-exceeding-url-length-limit/191799</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:daf19a59-8590-4289-a28b-f205994c27e2</guid><dc:creator>Community Jira</dc:creator><description>Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Our development team will review it in the context of our ongoing projects and priorities. Your understanding and patience as we assess this matter is appreciated. We have recorded the issue in our tracking system under the reference number SDLCOM-6725</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to receive all fields of multiple termbase entries without exceeding URL length limit</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60438/how-to-receive-all-fields-of-multiple-termbase-entries-without-exceeding-url-length-limit/191800</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:84459599-9d3e-4495-9e88-01e1aa2ad86e</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Andrew Hartnett</dc:creator><description>hi Tamas Meszaros , The 414 (Request-URI Too Long) is coming from the practical URL length limit enforced by the web server/proxy in front of the API, so very long fields=... + many humanReadableIds=... parameters will hit that limit. To address the “I just want everything” scenario: we’re currently testing support for a wildcard on the fields parameter (e.g. fields=*) to avoid having to send a very long explicit list. It’s not something we’re ready to officially document/promote yet while we complete validation, but it should help with exactly the use case you described and significantly reduce the URL size. Until this is fully supported/documented, the reliable workaround is to batch the IDs into smaller groups to keep the request URL under the limit. I’ll keep you posted as soon as we can confirm the wildcard is fully supported and ready to be documented. Currently tracking yr feedback here SDLCOM-6725 so that I remember to circle back to you when this is supported</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: How to receive all fields of multiple termbase entries without exceeding URL length limit</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60438/how-to-receive-all-fields-of-multiple-termbase-entries-without-exceeding-url-length-limit</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:38c44ede-594f-4b36-b176-62c6c8e95d3d</guid><dc:creator>Tamas Meszaros</dc:creator><description>Hi, I would like to read several termbase entries through the LC rest API, and I would like to query all fields of them. According to the docu, optional fields are not returned by default, so I have to specify all required fields in the fields parameter. This alone is already very long, ~ 3300 characters: fields=humanReadableId,languages.language.languageCode,languages.language.englishName,languages.terms.text,languages.terms.systemStatus,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.termbaseFieldId,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.name,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.value,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.fieldValueLinks.type,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.fieldValueLinks.value,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.createdAt,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedAt,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.email,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.firstName,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.lastName,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.anonymized,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.anonymizedUserName,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.email,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.firstName,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.lastName,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.anonymized,languages.terms.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.anonymizedUserName,languages.terms.createdAt,languages.terms.lastModifiedAt,languages.terms.createdBy.email,languages.terms.createdBy.firstName,languages.terms.createdBy.lastName,languages.terms.createdBy.anonymized,languages.terms.createdBy.anonymizedUserName,languages.terms.lastModifiedBy.email,languages.terms.lastModifiedBy.firstName,languages.terms.lastModifiedBy.lastName,languages.terms.lastModifiedBy.anonymized,languages.terms.lastModifiedBy.anonymizedUserName,languages.termbaseFieldValues.termbaseFieldId,languages.termbaseFieldValues.name,languages.termbaseFieldValues.value,languages.termbaseFieldValues.fieldValueLinks.type,languages.termbaseFieldValues.fieldValueLinks.value,languages.termbaseFieldValues.createdAt,languages.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedAt,languages.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.email,languages.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.firstName,languages.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.lastName,languages.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.anonymized,languages.termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.anonymizedUserName,languages.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.email,languages.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.firstName,languages.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.lastName,languages.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.anonymized,languages.termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.anonymizedUserName,termbaseFieldValues.termbaseFieldId,termbaseFieldValues.name,termbaseFieldValues.value,termbaseFieldValues.fieldValueLinks.type,termbaseFieldValues.fieldValueLinks.value,termbaseFieldValues.createdAt,termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedAt,termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.email,termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.firstName,termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.lastName,termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.anonymized,termbaseFieldValues.createdBy.anonymizedUserName,termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.email,termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.firstName,termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.lastName,termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.anonymized,termbaseFieldValues.lastModifiedBy.anonymizedUserName,createdAt,lastModifiedAt,createdBy.email,createdBy.firstName,createdBy.lastName,createdBy.anonymized,createdBy.anonymizedUserName,lastModifiedBy.email,lastModifiedBy.firstName,lastModifiedBy.lastName,lastModifiedBy.anonymized,lastModifiedBy.anonymizedUserName The problem is that if I would like to specify e.g. 20 entry IDs like humanReadableIds=LC6570452991d6c955906daf37&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65707c7082468403c1f9e318&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65707cf5edee745afa957d55&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65707e3082468403c1f9e509&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65707f0382468403c1f9e6de&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC657081c1edee745afa98b06d&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC6570821682468403c1fd023d&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65708372edee745afa9a787e&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC657084e582468403c1fff69a&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC657086ec82468403c1015b43&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC657087e2edee745afa9cd67a&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC657094a0edee745afaadb66b&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65719422edee745afaf41032&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC6571958aedee745afaf420dd&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC6571962982468403c14c177c&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65719678edee745afaf42829&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC6571972cedee745afaf43a28&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC6571998bedee745afaf9d717&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65719b8082468403c15526e6&amp;amp;humanReadableIds=LC65719e2dedee745afaf9ed34 then I already get an error like 414 (Request-URI Too Long) ~ the complete GET query is 4275 characters long. Is there a trick maybe reduce the length? It seems to be kind of waste to use 3300 characters just to express that I would get everything, and having to increase the API calls just because too few space remains for the IDs. E.g. wildcards would be perfect to use, but AFAIK they are not supported. thanks, Tamas</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Potential outage at Dec 27th, 10:01–22:30 PST</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/59999/potential-outage-at-dec-27th-10-01-22-30-pst/191040</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:e4667698-5954-4b58-bd37-9c143fd17bcb</guid><dc:creator>Evgenii Samarin</dc:creator><description>Hello! We had no such logs, but do you have any information about the potential outage? Do you have a status page where we can track such events?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to uplad Perfect Match files to the cloud?</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60204/how-to-uplad-perfect-match-files-to-the-cloud/190894</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:c1456127-7dfa-4505-9e4f-ddecc7f83903</guid><dc:creator>Rares Tritean</dc:creator><description>Yes, please open a ticket IF creating a mapping with the example I&amp;#39;ve provided does not work.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to uplad Perfect Match files to the cloud?</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60204/how-to-uplad-perfect-match-files-to-the-cloud/190890</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 08:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:255185af-9425-4195-86db-83190a7c1933</guid><dc:creator>Andr&amp;#233;</dc:creator><description>Sounds like a plan This is the trace id: xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx EDIT: The ID is always replaced. How can i provide it? Via Ticket?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to uplad Perfect Match files to the cloud?</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60204/how-to-uplad-perfect-match-files-to-the-cloud/190889</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 08:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:783c9e7d-2378-49de-832c-b22b15e44c12</guid><dc:creator>Rares Tritean</dc:creator><description>Hi, When creating a new Perfect Match Mapping you should be able to only send the projectId that the mapping will be associated to, i.e: your not started project 6970fa5993d3cd12124d7bbe: { &amp;quot;projectId&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;6970fa5993d3cd12124d7bbe&amp;quot; } If this step fails, please provide us with a TraceID so we can investigate this further. Let&amp;#39;s unblock this first step then we can continue with the rest of the flow. - Rares.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to uplad Perfect Match files to the cloud?</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60204/how-to-uplad-perfect-match-files-to-the-cloud/190857</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 13:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:c7ed9a89-b51d-4860-94eb-928e557e0cea</guid><dc:creator>Andr&amp;#233;</dc:creator><description>Hi Rares, thanks for your reply. My first attempt was to upload the sdlxliff files for PerfectMatch via the Add Source File endpoint. But I think this is the wrong way. After that I tried to create a Perfect Match Mapping . My body looks like this: { &amp;quot;projectId&amp;quot; : &amp;quot;6970fa5993d3cd12124d7bbe&amp;quot; , &amp;quot;matchingProjects&amp;quot; : [ &amp;quot;6970e3e69e57314fefbc15b5&amp;quot; ] } I also tried it without matchingProjects (because I dont want to use other projects for Perfect Match) but I always get this as response: { &amp;quot;errorCode&amp;quot; : &amp;quot;invalid&amp;quot; , &amp;quot;message&amp;quot; : &amp;quot;Input validation error occurred. No further details available.&amp;quot; , &amp;quot;details&amp;quot; : [] } The project with id 6970fa5993d3cd12124d7bbe is not started. Without mappingid I cannot use any of the other Perfect Match endpoints. So right now, I am stuck. What am I doing wrong?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: How to uplad Perfect Match files to the cloud?</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60204/how-to-uplad-perfect-match-files-to-the-cloud/190838</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 08:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:59bd83e6-5265-4edf-88bf-85ba919658fa</guid><dc:creator>Rares Tritean</dc:creator><description>Hi, The Perfect Match Mapping flows are detailed in the official documentation . When working with the Trados Cloud API, you may use the Create Perfect Match Mapping endpoint to create a new one, then Perfect Match should work automatically if conditions above are met. If you need to provide your own files as sources to match against, you can use this endpoint to upload your files. If your project is already started, and you upload new source files, that is considered a new Batch, so creating a new Perfect Match Batch Mapping associated with your project is a must. Can you please provide more details about your specific use-case? It will help us provide the correct assistance. Thank you, Rares.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: How to uplad Perfect Match files to the cloud?</title><link>https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/f/language_cloud_sdkapi_qa/60204/how-to-uplad-perfect-match-files-to-the-cloud</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10acfa76-f078-475b-a7ef-fc5b3e8d2934:becae298-ce19-4a3b-b4a0-8456601ed75b</guid><dc:creator>Andr&amp;#233;</dc:creator><description>We recently started using the Trados Cloud platform. I am trying to upload the Perfect Match files (.sdlxliff) via the REST API. Creating a project and uploading the files (via API) works, but Perfect Match is then skipped in the workflow for the files. Unfortunately, the API reference does not provide quite as much information as it should for the whole thing to work. I upload the files using the “Add Source File” endpoint: api.eu.cloud.trados.com/.../v1 /projects/{projectId}/source-files The question is, what exactly should the properties look like? Currently, they look like this: var bilingualUploadProps = Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConvert.SerializeObject(new { name = sdlxliffname, role = &amp;quot;reference&amp;quot;, type = &amp;quot;sdlxliff&amp;quot;, language = sourceLanguageShort }); Are role and type correct? Unfortunately, that doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be enough. Do I now have to create a “PerfectMatch Mapping” using the API? If so, how do I do that for the .sdlxliff files? By default the PerfectMatch Mapping want to have &amp;quot;matchingProjects&amp;quot; but we don&amp;#39;t have these yet. We want to use the older sdlxliff files. Thanks for the help.</description><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/Upload">Upload</category><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/Cloud%2bproject">Cloud project</category><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/Rest%2bAPI">Rest API</category><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/SDLXLIFF">SDLXLIFF</category><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/Trados%2bTeam">Trados Team</category><category domain="https://community.rws.com/developers-more/trados-portfolio/language-cloud-developers/tags/PerfectMatch">PerfectMatch</category></item></channel></rss>