Translate
Do budget constraints lead customers to go for light PE instead of full PE (with / without review) thus sacrificing quality to some extent? Any successful methods in preventing that?
Do budget constraints lead customers to go for light PE instead of full PE (with / without review) thus sacrificing quality to some extent? Any successful methods in preventing that?
Hi,
yes this happens (quite often actually). This is where our advice as experts becomes really valuable: depending on the subject and the purpose of a document, the client won't need the same quality. You could find and use typically gross examples of inefficient light PE versus revised PE ;)
Hi,
yes this happens (quite often actually). This is where our advice as experts becomes really valuable: depending on the subject and the purpose of a document, the client won't need the same quality. You could find and use typically gross examples of inefficient light PE versus revised PE ;)
I also have a nice response from Andrea Stevens:
"Different content types can require different approaches. Depending on the audience or the purpose of a document, Light PE may be an appropriate solution. Light PE delivers a quality level that is fit-for-purpose, where the focus is on understandability and usability of the output. We aim to work with our clients to establish which level of post-editing is right for their content."
Paul Filkin | RWS Group
________________________
Design your own training!
You've done the courses and still need to go a little further, or still not clear?
Tell us what you need in our Community Solutions Hub
