Under Community Review

Improve UX of inbox view

When working with the inbox, there are some filtering / grouping options that do not seem to work as expected.

When groupong tasks by project I in this example get 18 entries:

Trados Enterprise inbox showing 18 entries grouped by project, with a red annotation highlighting the number of entries.

If I add the group selector to include languages besides projects, I get less entries:

Trados Enterprise inbox showing 10 entries grouped by target language and project, with 'Other' containing one target language.

Here I only see 10 entries listed and "Other" only contains one target language.

If I remove the project grouping, I get way more languages listed:

Trados Enterprise inbox showing a larger list of target languages without project grouping, with the target filter selected.

Am I missing something here? I do not think this works as expected.

In case there are incompatible groupings, I think the 2nd grouping should get greyed out if you have selected the first grouping.

Bernhard Hoell

  • Hi - I will raise a support ticket as suggested. I did compare the counts and they seem not to make any sense:

    I have the following numbers for different groupings selected:

    Target -> 426

    Target + Project -> 85

    Project -> 285

    I think there may be a general problem, I got informed about this by one of our vendors but I found I see the same symptoms...

    Best,

    Bernhard

  • Hi Bernhard,

    Like you, I'm also confused why you see more languages listed in your third screenshot than what is displayed in your second screenshot. The grouping criteria you have selected should be compatible, as a task should always belong to a target language (or "Other" for non-target language level tasks) and a project.

    Can you please raise a support ticket for this to be investigated, and follow up here to summarize their findings?

    Out of interest, does the numbers displayed in the "Count" column add up to the same value for each of the grouping conditions you have set?

    Cheers,

    Ian