Not Considering

Include a review deadline in the ManTra ‘Ready to Review’ emails

Hi, we have a customer who want to know the review deadline in the ManTra ‘Ready to Review’ emails.

Because they said that asking for review, showing review deadline will be more appropriate.

Understand that once we login to ManTra, we can see the review deadline in the ManTra UI, but people want to see that in ‘Ready to Review’ emails.

 

Thank you,

  • This feature is included in the 19.7 update for SDL Managed Translation, released on the 4th July 2019.

  • Hi Ian,

    is there already more concrete info when this feature will be included?

    Thanks,

    Jacqueline

  • Hi Ian,

    Thank you for looking into this.

    Yes, the customer is using the project schedule functionality. The date appear as Dead line in the FILES FOR REVIEW inbox in ManTra.

    Yes, the review deadline is equate to the stage deadline for the review workflow step.

    Honestly always set same deadline for all file for a given language/project reach the review step. Yes, tightest deadline should be take, if each files has different deadline. Because fail safe concept.  "Review in SDL Language Cloud" stage deadline we should include in the 'Ready to Review' email notification.

    Cheers,

    Hitoshi

  • Hi Hitoshi,

    Thanks for raising this product suggestion. Can you please confirm how/where the review deadline is being captured and stored in TMS? Is the customer using the project schedule functionality; in which case, the review deadline would equate to the stage deadline for the review workflow step?

    In Managed Translation, we send a single 'Ready to Review' email when all files for a given language/project reach the review step. Where project schedules are being used, however, it is possible to define different stage deadlines for each file. In this scenario, what stage deadline should we include in the 'Ready to Review' email notification? Should we always take the earliest date for the project/language? i.e. the file with the tightest deadline?

    Cheers,

    Ian