Hi Paul,

Unknown said:

A proper application that could use the proper analysis mechanisms would be quite cool I think.

I thing for a proper analysis using the proper analysis mechanisms you need a TM and you can not fake a TM with fuzzy matches from the SDLXLIFF.

On the other hand within the SDLXLIFF there is all the information needed to do an approximation i.e

1. Count the words of the source text (removing any tags , numbers, variables etc.) from the source element

<source>New unit.<x id="86" /></source>

2. Add them to the appropriate group based on the percent attribute of the sdl:seg element

<sdl:seg id="23" conf="Translated" origin="tm" percent="100">

as long as they are not repetitions i.e. check if  the sdl:rep element exists

<sdl:rep id="a0d5eecf-b918-4c72-b4f6-7aabd7fdcf73-20" />

Do you thing that an application like that is really needed?

Regards,
Costas

Costas Nadalis said:

Do you thing that an application like that is really needed?

Hi Costas,

You're picking all things I was thinking (but don't know what they're called ;-))  I don't think it would be an application that would see an enormous number of downloads, but I do think it's quite a useful tool to have access to... maybe we'd be surprised.  I quite like the ability to extract information like this from an sdlxliff and maybe there is more informaiton I haven't thought about that would be useful here too?

Regards

Paul

to be able to re-produce the statistical analysis ideally you would need to know the source of translation that was associated with segment that is present in the SDLXLIFF file.

I fear that to dispute the % that was calculated and associated with pre-translated segment you would need to know the source of segment otherwise you are simply taking the % as they are presented and counting words & chars.

The only solid information in this scenario would be if there were 100% (or greater) matches included with the pre-translation; then at least from that you could create a mock TM to base any sort of re-analysis.

source is the key sounds like something out of star wars

Hi Patrick,

More good points.  But the dispute here is that the analysis available to the user for their payment is not based on a Studio analysis... at least it may not be.  So as a starting point if you were able to easily represent the values of the information in the sdlxliff you already have, because you will be ignoring CM and 100% matches "maybe", and only doing the rest, then you at least have the basis of a dispute (if you actually want to continue working for someone who works this way in the first place).

Without this you can only say you have a feeling this is wrong and you would like to have more information, like a proper analysis report or the TM used to prepare the file etc.  If it was me I would do something like the speadsheet first so I could say "Look, I have an an analysis of the file you sent me and it doesn't match what you are prepared to pay.  So I think there is something amiss.  Can we review this please."  This would be better than having no ammunition at all other than a feeling it is wrong.

Maybe it's just me?

Paul

yeah; good point; I guess this makes sense, if you can do some basic association on the information already present; if the numbers don't match up at all to the analysis, then it would be the basis of an inquiry as you suggested; sounds good

However,  whoever is being put in a situation like this is not being treated very well by the client in my opinion; but I guess that is not the topic for this thread

Unknown said:

However,  whoever is being put in a situation like this is not being treated very well by the client in my opinion; but I guess that is not the topic for this thread

So, in a nutshell you need a tool, that reads in an existing SDL-XLIFF file and simply counts all existing translation units like this:

CM: 523 units

100%: 89 Units

95-99%: 23 Units

85-94%: 12 Units

75-84%: 346 Units

50-74%: 612 Units

No Match: 2436 Units.

That should be easy.

Hi Paul,

If no one else is interested I can add it in the next version of the SDLXliff2TMX together with the vanilla xliff export.

Regards,

Costas

Costas Nadalis said:

If no one else is interested I can add it in the next version of the SDLXliff2TMX together with the vanilla xliff export.

Costas Nadalis said:

If no one else is interested I can add it in the next version of the SDLXliff2TMX together with the vanilla xliff export.