Barry,

Most probably the tabular alignment does not mix very well with the math.
But I do have a question for you: why can't you use a trule (tabular text rule)?
Or is that because it would draw a rule the width of the 99.99 entry and what you really want is a rule as wide as the 9.9 entry?

So why not use a normal <ul> in that case?

Bart

Hi Barry,

I agree with Bart; math and tabular alignment were not designed to play together.

If using a trule instead of math does not give the desired result, have you tried defining a separate "underline" in the JT/DT (where you can give it the characteristics you want in order to match the results you were getting for the underline using math) and then just using <ul;#>...<ul;0> around the text?

I agree with Bart that I think this is a "mis-use" of Math and I suspect that whatever version you use this will not work or be accepted as a RFE.

What we do is use the trule as Bart suggests and have never had any issues - we have been doing this for years!

Chris, at first I did misread the last sentence of your answer as:

What we always do is to do as Bart suggests and we never had any issues - we have been doing this for years

 [:D]