• State Not Answered
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 577 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options

Reviewing source lists with pslcmd and /check

Nils Jörn

Dear all,

I'd like to create a powershell script (or batch file) which will review the source lists of a .lpu file which only contains source lists.

If I start Passolo and the checking process manually, everything works as espected.

Unfortunately, trying to run the checks from command line with pslcmd and the "/check" option Passolo starts as well as the review process, but does not find any possible issues and the log file is empty.

My command line looks like this: "start "" /wait "C:\Program Files (x86)\Trados\Passolo\Passolo 2022\pslcmd.exe" %1 /check /options:"\\[server]\folder\Translations\SDL\SDL Passolo\Optionen\TermSpellCheck.pslopt" temp content:check /output:C:\tmp\Passolo-Check.log". Where "%1" is the name of the .lpu file, i. e. "SourceLists.lpu".

Please be so kind to let me know, why it's not possible to run the review by command line.
Thank you very much in advance for any hint.

Best regards and have a nice day.
Nils
emoji
Rate translation
×
Suggest better translation
×
Parents
  • 0

    Here’s a revised command example based on your setup:

    cmd
    start "" /wait "C:\Program Files (x86)\Trados\Passolo\Passolo 2022\pslcmd.exe" "SourceLists.lpu" /check /options:"\\server\folder\Translations\SDL\SDL Passolo\Optionen\TermSpellCheck.pslopt" /output:C:\tmp\Passolo-Check.log

    Make sure there are no special characters or spaces in the file paths unless they are correctly quoted.

    If these steps do not resolve the issue, consider reaching out to SDL Passolo support for further assistance.
    emoji
  • 0 in reply to Dinesh Maurya

    Hi ,

    thank you very much for your reply.

    As far as I can see, one of the differences between your and my command line is, that you're writing the name of the .lpu file directly into the line instead of using a placeholder.

    The second difference seems to be that you're not using "temp content:check".
    Why do you think, leaving out "temp content:check" will/could solve the issue? Thinking

    Thank you very much in advance for your clarification.

    Best regards and have a nice day.
    Nils
    emoji
Reply
  • 0 in reply to Dinesh Maurya

    Hi ,

    thank you very much for your reply.

    As far as I can see, one of the differences between your and my command line is, that you're writing the name of the .lpu file directly into the line instead of using a placeholder.

    The second difference seems to be that you're not using "temp content:check".
    Why do you think, leaving out "temp content:check" will/could solve the issue? Thinking

    Thank you very much in advance for your clarification.

    Best regards and have a nice day.
    Nils
    emoji
Children
No Data