Yvonne Rezbach 

You problem is most likely that you have the IATE plugin set up in your project templates.  So it's up to you to make sure that you do not create packages from projects that use this plugin, or if you do make sure you don't include any termbase links.

Yvonne Rezbach 

You problem is most likely that you have the IATE plugin set up in your project templates.  So it's up to you to make sure that you do not create packages from projects that use this plugin, or if you do make sure you don't include any termbase links.

Thank you, Paul . As I said I need the plug in internally for translation in some languages of the projects - so the only way is to have a separate project for internal translation if I want to send out the real termbases to the translators with the packages? Is that correct? It reads like I only include termbase files in the project, not links to termbases...?

Is there any other setting I'm missing in the package creation dialog?

Thank you :-)

yve

Yvonne Rezbach 

In fact even if I remove everything from the settings the Termbase provide is still included.  So two things for me:

1. we should raise an idea to be able to exclude a Terminology Provider from a package in same way as we can exclude MT/TM providers
2. you need to work a different way

On the latter.  It's probably easiest to just not include IATE in your project template.  Create your packages and then once they are all sent out and you need to work on the project just add IATE as a resource in your project settings.  Not ideal, but I don't think you have an option if you want to avoid this problem... unless you want to start editing the sdlproj from every package you send out!

Thank you very much, Paul . At least now I know it's me and it can be dealt with maybe in the future. If you say "we should raise an idea" does that mean we = RWS or we = me? ;-)

Yvonne Rezbach 

Yvonne Rezbach said:

If you say "we should raise an idea" does that mean we = RWS or we = me? ;-)

Good point... I think I meant the "royal we", so would be good for you to raise the idea since this is a feature you would like to see.  It also looks better coming from you (as a real user) than me (as a non-real user who thinks it's a good idea).

Will do :-) Thanks, Paul