Missing many characters in xyview Table Display only when Figure EPS image precedes Table in XPP 9.4.1

We upgraded our dev and test servers from 9.2.2 to 9.4.1. 

Our tables and figures are in pickups and are ordered by the sequence they are called out in the text. The sequence could be Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Figure 1, Table 4 or the sequence could be Figure 1, Table 1, Table 2, Figure 2, Figure 3. 

During testing of the upgrade, we discovered that in the xyview and in page text mode, when a figure precedes the first table, all the characters in the table do not display as shown below. 

Screenshot of Trados Studio showing Table 1 with missing characters in the 'Consensus classification' column.

If we move the figure after the first table, close the file, and reopen it, all tables display with all characters as shown below. 

Screenshot of Trados Studio displaying Table 1 with all characters visible after reordering the figure and table sequence.

In articles where the first Table is cited before the first figure, there is not problem with the display. 

The figures are EPS images. 

If we delete the graphic block (eps image) in the Figure and leave the other parts, all characters display.  

Screenshot of Trados Studio with Figure 1 displaying estimated serogroup distribution, no visible errors.

All characters always visible in the line editor. All characters are always visible in the PDF.

The problem occurs whether we use Exceed 15, Exceed Turbo X, or MobaXterm. 

The problem occurs when the file is opened on a Mac and on a PC. 

This does not happen in 9.2.2. 

We are running RHEL 7.9 on dev, test, and prod. 

We have been working with RWS technical support to resolve this but they can't reproduce it on their system.

We are going to test with the 9.4.0 version of xyview, compose, and place_ads executables and possibly later releases but that's all we've got. 

Has anyone else seen this type of behavior? Any thoughts for a solution? 

Thank you,
Jaye Mize

Director, Content Production Systems

JAMA NetworkTm

330 N Wabash Ave, Ste 39300, Chicago, IL 60611

T 312-464-4712  M 719-431-2462

jamanetwork.com



Generated Image Alt-Text
[edited by: Trados AI at 5:26 AM (GMT 0) on 5 Mar 2024]
emoji
Parents
  • Hi Jaye,

    Since you seem to have this weird font problem only when using the xyview, I would think the problem must be related to Ghostscript.
    XPP V9.2 was using V9.21 of Ghostscript, while XPP V9.4 is using the newer V9.50.

    Strangely enough you say the SDL/RWS can not duplicate this problem using your data.

    What could be interesting to see if you create a PDF using Ghostscript, if you encounter the same font problem or not.

    Also interesting to know if your XPP V9.4 installation is a fresh installation or an upgrade of an existing V9.2 system.
    If it is an upgrade, do you know if somebody did anything special or weird to your Gostscript environment in the past?

  • Hi Bart,

    I created PDFs using Ghostscript and I did not encounter the same font display problem in the PDF as in the open DIV. That's actually how I determined that it's a display (WYSIWYG) problem. I was getting all ready to open a call with SDL Technical Support and was going to make PDFs of the page in 9.2.2 and 9.4.1 and show the missing characters and they weren't missing in the PDF after all--only in the open XPP DIV. 

    It looks like corruption but it's not. It just doesn't display all the characters in the table when the DIV is open in XPP. 
    Below is a screen shot of a table in 9.4.1. There are only 7s visible in columns 2 and 3. 

    Below is the GS PDF output. 


    But if I delete the figure or move it to after the Table, close the file, and reopen, it displays just fine. 

    It was an upgrade of 9.2.2, not a fresh install. And our IT department did it in stages, first to 9.4 then to 9.4.1. There were problems initially with the install of the 9.4.1 patch but we think we got that worked out. We did not watch them do either of the installs and we don't ever plan to let that happen again. 

    I do not know if anyone did anything special or weird to our GhostScript environment. (If anyone did, it might have been you!) We will look at it to see.

  • It wasn't me!

    If it would be possible, I would do a fresh install.
    It might be a bit of work but it would be a good exercise (especially it you document it) to find out which parts of the system you have modified.
    (it also gets rid of all the unnecessary ballast you have accumulated over the years)

Reply Children