Hi Paul,

I just tried it and it worked. Thank you!

There are also many '=*' in the files. How can I exclude those?

I feel that I need to know the programming language to set up those regex, which I do not. Is there a list of all the regex available somewhere that can be used for reference?

Thank you!

Olena Polissky 

If it's '=*' meaning just =* then use a placeholder as opposed to a tag pair and just use this:

=\*

A star has a special purpose in regex so you have to escape it with the backslash when you actually need to find it.  In .NET (or C#) regular expressions (which is the flavour Trados Studio uses), the star symbol (*) is a quantifier that matches the preceding element zero or more times.  This means that the element before the * can appear any number of times, including not at all.

Olena Polissky said:

I feel that I need to know the programming language to set up those regex, which I do not. Is there a list of all the regex available somewhere that can be used for reference?

Regex, short for regular expressions, is not typically described as a programming language.  It's just a powerful tool, or a form of syntax used for matching patterns within strings.  There are many free tutorials on the internet that are helpful for this as it's a syntax used in many many types of software including decent text editors like Notepad++ for example.  But here's a few to help you get started:

Tutorials

https://www.regular-expressions.info/

https://regexone.com/

Testers

Paid for: https://www.regexbuddy.com/

Free: https://regex101.com/

Studio Related

https://multifarious.filkin.com/tag/regex-tutorial/

https://www.web-translations.com/blog/regular-expressions/

https://noradiaz.blogspot.com/2019/10/regular-expressions-for-translators_24.html

Probably many more if you search around.  There was a book written by a regular contributor to this forum and I was sure it used to be on the appstore.  But I cannot find it... perhaps someone will see this and point to it!  I think that could also be quite helpful.

Hi Paul,

I tried the placeholder =\*, but unfortunately, it didn't show any difference.

Is there another way to exclude those?

Also, some '+' signs are not part of the placeholder in the square brackets; is it possible to exclude these as well?

Thank you for the links as well, I'll make sure to check them out.

Thanks Jerzy Czopik .  Do you have them?

I only ever had one book on regular expressions... the bible :-)

https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/regular-expressions-cookbook/9781449327453/

Brilliant resource, and also from the developer of RegexBuddy and EditPadPro.  But if I'm honest, whilst I used this a lot a decade or so ago I find there are easier ways to solve tricky regex problems using online resources these days.  CHatGPT being one of them... recent updates are making it better and better!

Olena Polissky 

Perhaps you would do better to share a couple of real strings?  That way we can be sure we're providing you with the appropriate help.

 Paul 

I have bought both, but did not yet read any of these. And the best way to get a good regex solution is to ask some Paul Filkin or develop this with own means.

From what I see above you have already excluded the content in []. To exclude conten in +[]+ I would use \+\[[^]]*?\]\+

But I'm on an ICE train and not sure if I got your question right.

Hi Paul,

Yes, of course.

Here is the string with a '+' sign tat is not before/after the square brackets.

you have reached + your charging station + [chargingstation_address] + in + [parent_poi_name]

These two strings show in the Excel file as follows:

 The same strings showing in Studio Editor (with added '=*'

Olena Polissky 

\+\s?\[[^]]*?\]\s?\+

Is this to exclude the plus signs that are not before/after the square brackets?

What about the =* appearing in Studio?

Thank you!

Olena Polissky 

=\*

Will definitely address this.  Make sure you have added the new rule as a placeholder and not a tag pair in some way.  And also BEFORE you create your project.  It's too late afterwards.

Jerzy Czopik said:

\+\s?\[[^]]*?\]\s?\+

Nice solution from Jerzy, but this will be a placeholder and not a tag pair.  If you want to still be able to read the non-translatable content then your solution is a good one, if not than using a placeable is the simplest.

Tried the placeholder below but still see many plusses in the files...

\+\s?\[[^]]*?\]\s?\+

Thank you anyway; I'll keep playing with this.

Olena Polissky 

So there are irregularities in the occurence of the plus signs. If this shall only be a placeable, this will hopefully help

\+\s*?\[[^]]*?\]\s*?\+

If you wanna use it as tag pair, try this:

\+\s*?\[

\]\s*?\+

Olena Polissky 

So there are irregularities in the occurence of the plus signs. If this shall only be a placeable, this will hopefully help

\+\s*?\[[^]]*?\]\s*?\+

If you wanna use it as tag pair, try this:

\+\s*?\[

\]\s*?\+