I haven't used Xbench in years but recently a client started asking me about it in order to use it a translation environment.
I admit it, I am very rusty in Xbench but I can't find a single advantage of using it over the most advanced features of the Studio QA. Particularly with regex--thanks to Paul Flint and Nora Díaz.
I like the report aspect of Regex but for productivity I am getting too many false positives and missing issues.
What do you all think?
I use Studio's verification features extensively, but still use Verifika as a second layer of verification and I find that it helps me catch things that I would have missed otherwise. I have used Xbench in the past but not recently, so I'm afraid I'm also rusty when it comes to Xbench! Having said that, I do think the additional verification is worth it, particularly with technical documents.
I use Studio's verification features extensively, but still use Verifika as a second layer of verification and I find that it helps me catch things that I would have missed otherwise. I have used Xbench in the past but not recently, so I'm afraid I'm also rusty when it comes to Xbench! Having said that, I do think the additional verification is worth it, particularly with technical documents.
Translate
