Strange TM match numbers with 2 TMs

I am getting strange TM match numbers when I use 2 TMs.
When I add a second TM, the number of fuzzy matches increases and the number of 100% matches decreases.
I was under the impression that adding a TM could only improve my matches.
For example, here are the match figures for the job I am currently working on.
Here are the figures with one TM:
I then add the second TM (with a penalty of 3), and get the following match figures:
Note that there are 19 segments in the 95%-99% range with 1 TM and 171 segments in this range with 2 TMs.
If I update the project TMs (using both TMs) and then rerun the analysis with just one TM, I get the following:
Before the project TMs were updated, there were 17 segments in the 95%-99% range (1 TM) and there are 4 segments in this range after updating (1 TM).
If I add the second TM, I see the following analysis:
There were 171 segments in the 95%-99% range (2 TMs) before the project TMs were updated and there are 134 segments in this range (2 TMs) after the update.
In summary:
1 TM, before update: 19 segments in 95%-99% range
1 TM, after update: 4 segments
2 TMs, before update: 171 segments
2 TMs, after update: 134 segments
There are two mysteries:
1. Why does adding another TM increase the number of fuzzy matches (decreasing the number of 100% and context matches), both before and after the project TMs are updated ?
2. Why does updating the project TMs change anything? I thought the project TMs were continuously updated during the translation.
Anyone have an idea about what is happening? I have lost a bit of my confidence in the matching algorithm being used.
Regards,
Bruce Campbell
A S A P Language Services
Parents Reply
  • Hi Nora,

    That confirms my finding, after some testing after we encountered the same issue. Removing the penalty for Multiple Translations leads to better results.
    In my opinion, an additional setting that allowed enabling/disabling a penalty for Multiple Translations across multiple TMs would be very helpful. You could still put a penalty on multiple translations within the same TM but otherwise just pick the match from the first TM. Like this order of the TMs would matter.
    In the current situation, it is all or nothing, which doesn't really work for us.

    It would be great if anybody from SDL [[mention:b9ae8ac38ee54dbf9947d3168c567eaf:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] ?] could confirm our theory.

    Greetings from Brussels,
    Raphaël
Children